Weight doesn't get the attention lumens and IP ratings get on a spec sheet, but it's one of the most operationally relevant numbers — it determines how many people a deployment needs and how often equipment actually gets repositioned.
Weight is a direct input into how often equipment actually gets repositioned in practice — see our single-person deployment guide for why this matters operationally, not just as a spec-sheet number. A lighter unit that's genuinely easy to move gets moved as work requires; a heavier one tends to stay wherever it was first set up.
A site with a fixed, long-duration lighting position doesn't get much practical benefit from a lighter unit — the LI-500's weight is a reasonable trade-off for its output and wind rating in that context. A site repositioning lighting multiple times a shift benefits directly from the LI-300 or LI-TP-200's lighter weight.
Published fitting weights exclude battery packs, which add their own weight on top — factor this in when planning who's physically moving equipment, particularly for the LI-500 running multiple packs simultaneously.
Compare full spec sheets for LI-300, LI-500, LI-TP-200, LI-TC-300, and LI-S3 for exact figures.
LI-S3: 190g. LI-TP-200: 4.4kg. LI-300: 8.2kg. LI-TC-300: 8.4kg. LI-500: 50-52kg-class depending on mast height. All excluding battery packs.
It's a direct input into how often equipment actually gets repositioned in practice — a lighter unit that's genuinely easy to move gets moved as work requires; a heavier one tends to stay put.
No — for a fixed, long-duration lighting position, the LI-500's weight is a reasonable trade-off for its higher output and wind rating. Weight matters most for deployments that reposition frequently.
No — published fitting weights exclude battery packs, which add their own weight on top, particularly relevant for the LI-500 running multiple packs simultaneously.
How fast, single-person deployment changes site operations.
Read More →A practical checklist for evaluating equipment before you commit.
Read More →A direct comparison between two different deployment approaches.
Read More →